email

[solved] Week 7 Individual SWOT and Strategic Objectives paper

SWOT to TOWS assigned readings
Assignment Overview: This week, each individual will use the group's SWOT matrix to generate strategies for
overcoming business risks and exploiting business opportunity in the recommended country. You have already
developed a competitor strategy, so the focus this week is on other business risks and opportunities and how your
client might use its strengths and weaknesses to gain strategic advantage (corresponds to Section 8iii of Business
Plan Template).
When the SWOT matrix is used for strategy generation, a TOWs matrix is initially generated to organize the SWOT
data into an expanded matrix (TOWs matrix) . The TOWs is an organizing tool to ensure that the strategies developed
will effectively utilize the client's strengths to mitigate the most critical risks and exploit the most important
opportunities. The TOWS matrix is merely an expanded SWOT matrix with quadrants to be used for strategy idea
generation, as described in this link:

http://www.driveyoursuccess.com/2011/09/strategic-business-planning-use-tows-to-move-swot-to-an-action-
plan.html

You can see an example of strategy formulation from TOWS in this link: http://www.volunteerhub.com/blog/the-tows-
matrix-putting-a-swot-analysis-into-action/

.
Assignment Objectives: The objectives are to use the SWOT data to propose specific business strategies (TOWS
strategies) that will (1) mitigate the identified risks (threats and weaknesses) for your client company’s entry into the
selected country; and (2) exploit the identified external opportunities.
Step One: Preparation: This is your idea generation step and reflects your primary analysis. Develop the TOWS
matrix, specifying the risk mitigating strategies and the opportunity exploiting strategies needed in each of the TOWS
quadrants.
For example, if your previous analysis identified political ties as necessary to compete in this country (external
Threat), but your client does not have those ties (internal Weakness), consider WT mitigation strategies (TOWS
quadrant WT). Perhaps a specific type of partner (politically connected/experienced) or some specific activity (like
political lobbying) might mitigate this risk for your client.
Similarly, for the primary external opportunity support factors for this country, specify a strategy that might leverage
your firm’s Strengths (quadrant OS strategies). For example, if your PESTEL analysis found an opportunity support
factor in the country's positive attitudes toward U.S. companies, consider how an OS strategy might leverage the U.S.
identity of your firm (its Strength) in order to exploit that opportunity (e.g., perhaps by sponsoring an athletic event
and/or by using product packaging that highlights U.S. origins or culture)

10/18/2017 Individual SWOT and Strategic Objectives paper - DMBA 630 9047 Marketing and Strategy Management in the Global Marketplace (2178)

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/le/content/287341/viewContent/10484330/View 2/3
For each of the TOWS quadrants, identify potential strategies that will help your firm to operate successfully in this
external environment of specific O’s and T’s. Limit the potential strategies to no more than 3 in each quadrant of
the TOWS matrix, focusing on the most important threats to be mitigated and opportunity factors to be realized. This
summary matrix should be included as an appendix to the formal paper.
Step Two: Write a formal paper explaining your strategy recommendations and referring to the TOWS data on which
those recommendations are based.

Paper Assignment Requirements/format:
1. Introduction. After the statement of purpose, the Introduction to this paper should be the same as in your
team's week 6 paper (updated with any feedback), PLUS a very brief description of the target Buyer and the
size and growth of the target market (from your team's week 6 paper).
2. The Body of the paper (10-12 pages) is solely your own writing:
List those external Opportunity and Threat factors that you consider the most important and therefore will
address with recommended strategies.
Recommend your strategies, explaining the rationale for each and why you consider the recommended
strategies the most critical/important.
The TOWs matrix should be in an appendix, and you can refer to it, but your text should stand
alone with sufficient written explanation for your strategy ideas and recommendations.
Propose mitigating strategies for country and industry Threats;
Propose exploiting strategies for Opportunity and Opportunity Support factors.
Write a Conclusion to your analysis that summarizes all the strategic actions you are recommending to
mitigate risk and exploit opportunity, including the competitor strategy previously agreed upon by the group
(this summary statement of competitive strategy will be the same for all group members, taken from what the
group has already developed).
3. Include :
Title page with your name
Approximately a 2 page Executive Summary that summarizes the entire paper (including the introduction
materials)
Table of contents
*The body of the paper should have page numbers, starting with page one.
Reference list, including proper APA format for all in-text citations.
The SWOT/Tows matrix as an appendix.
Post the assignment in your individual assignment folder AND in the group locker by the end of the week and
title it “SWOT and TOWS Strategies.” The team will proceed with next week's assignment, using all individual
members' analyses, without waiting for faculty feedback/grading.
Where you are now: With the completion of this assignment, you have addressed all risks and opportunity and
opportunity support factors. Each team member has now recommended specific risk mitigation and opportunity
exploitation strategies that will help your firm optimally operate in country, and the team has previously agreed
upon a competitive strategy for operating in country. The Team must now agree on which strategies to recommend
from these individual member analyses. Once the team has agreed on the strategies that must be implemented, the
team should update the draft business plan with these recommended strategies (constituting sections 11 and 12 of
the business plan template).
Looking ahead: Next week, the team will develop and compare two alternative entry strategies (business structure
and organizational structure) that will help your firm to realize the desired business strategies you have developed in
this TOWS analysis., . A corporate level entry strategy consists of both a business structure (the entry vehicle) and an
organizational structure for how your firm will operate in country. You will want to design an entry strategy that will
be best at implementing the desired risk mitigation and opportunity exploitation strategies..
Note: Some of the risk mitigation strategies that individual members have developed here may lead directly to a
type of entry vehicle ; e.g., if the country requires a joint venture with a local firm, that entry barrier has to be

10/18/2017 Individual SWOT and Strategic Objectives paper - DMBA 630 9047 Marketing and Strategy Management in the Global Marketplace (2178)

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/le/content/287341/viewContent/10484330/View 3/3
Due October 29 at 11:59 PM
mitigated with a specific vehicle (joint venture is the business structure that is required, and you would identify
the type of partner and define the partner responsibilities in an organizational structure).
Other mitigation strategies may lead less directly to an entry vehicle. For example, if team member(s) have
determined that a local presence will mitigate some political risk and/or mitigate a competitor's in-country
advantage, the team may consider what type of business structure (entry vehicle) could best provide that local
presence (e.g., an alliance with a local firm, a contract with a local distributor, hiring locals to staff a branch
sales office).



Need customized help? Order now
user img

Plus


15-06-22 | 04:20:15

Executive Summary

Created in 2003, Tesla’s automobile strategic business unit develops and sells all-electric powered vehicles. This alone creates
a competitive advantage amongst competitors; as competitors are fossil fuel based, with some competitors having hybrids and a
couple that offer an all-electric model. South Korea presents an opportunity for Tesla to expand, generate revenue and generate jobs
for South Koreans.
Entering the South Korean automobile industry, Tesla would have to face several competitors that are domestic and foreign
based. Domestic automobile manufacturers include Renault-Samsung Motors, Hyundai, GM Korea and SsangYong. Foreign
automobile manufacturers include BMW, Volkswagen, Audi Auto Group and Daimler Auto Group. Hyundai and GM Korea have the
largest market share in South Korea.
Market segmentation and target market research shows that South Korea has a population of 50 million, with 1 million
automobiles. Of the 1 million automobile owners, five-year estimate shows a 70 percent growth opportunity. The South Korean
government is offering incentives for its citizens to purchase electric vehicles, an aggressive one million registered electric vehicles by
2020.
Positioning strategy is to promote Tesla’s automobiles as an affordable option that is more environmentally friendly than
traditional fossil-fueled vehicles. Such positioning will also allow for brand recognition and allow Tesla to grow is other strategic
business units; while improving the infrastructure and providing Jobs for South Koreans.

Introduction

The purpose of this assignment is to identify Tesla’s competitive position in South Korea. In addition to that, the Tesla
organization will create a competitive strategy that will be defendable and outperform competitors whether they are within the United
States or our target market of South Korea. Through academic literature it was revealed that strategies are generic because they are
applicable to a large variety of situations and contexts. The three strategies that Michael Porter’s described were 1) overall cost
leadership; 2) differentiation; and 3) focus on particular market niche (Generic Competitive Strategies, 2009) . As a result, the goal is
to create a competitive strategy that will include our description of the type of buyer or target buyer, create a positioning message for
buyer’s segment; size the target market and quantifiable units and lastly make an attempt to forecast the target growth is South Korea
over the next 3 to 5 years.
The internal combustion engine revolutionized human travel, migration, and urbanization that had been largely shaped by the
rail industry. Prior to market domination, competing technologies challenge the early auto industry; steam powered and electric.
Personal vehicle transport through electricity dates back to the mid-18 th century. By the 1900’s, both electric vehicles and combustion
engines controlled the market. Henry Ford put the race to an end with the introduction of the first mass-market internal combustion
engine vehicle at less than half the cost of an equivalent electric engine. The automobile industry requires an entire supporting
network infrastructure that can challenge in alternative fuel source. The cost of entry in new fuel transportation stifled many attempts
over the last hundred years until the emergence of the Tesla Motors Company.

Founded in 2003, Tesla sought out to realize a vision of a high-performing all electric vehicle. Pioneer and innovator, Elon
Musk joined as chairman in 2004 and was instrumental in achieving his vision. Elon Musk had a simple strategy to enter a challenging
market, start with a high cost low production electric vehicle then moved to mass market. When deciding a rollout strategy, Tesla
decided to enter in the premium luxury market to enable sales at a price that could sustain development (Bibbeisi, 2017) . The roaster
was launched in 2008 and field Tesla’s cutting edge battery technology and electric powertrain. From there, Tesla designed the
world’s first ever premium all electric sedan from the ground up. Tesla’s vehicles are produced at its Fremont factory in California,
where the vast majority of the vehicles components are also may as Tesla continues to expand its product line. Tesla’s production
plant is also set to increase to a rate of 500,000 vehicles a year by 2018 (Tesla's Motors, 2017) . Supporting Tesla’s automotive and
energy products is a Gigafactory. The facility is designed to significantly reduce battery cell calls and by 2018 produce more lithium
ion batteries annually then were produce worldwide in 2013.
Tesla is able to create thousands of jobs largely because they are able to bring cell production in-house and manufacture
batteries at the volumes required to meet production goals. Tesla is excited about its future largely because of being able to make their
cars more accessible and affordable, accelerating the advent of clean transport, and clean energy production. The company states that
electric cars, batteries, and renewable energy generation and storage already exists independently, but when combined they become
even more powerful which is what they are striving for in the future (Tesla's Motors, 2017) .
In previous research, it was recommended that Tesla expand its global awareness in South Korea. It was revealed that in order
to be successful in a new market, Tesla will need significant resources within the country to be successful. South Korea would be able

to provide a workforce that are skilled in electrical engineering and the craftsmanship required to manufacture and maintain Tesla’s
fleet of electric automobiles. It was also noted that the region will also have the infrastructure in place to allow customers to charge
and properly utilize their vehicles. Because the economy of South Korea has experienced less inflation and most citizens of South
Korea have a high level of disposable income, purchasing the Tesla Model 3 should not create a financial hardship for the average
citizen. Moreover, South Korea offers a free zone for trade which will make entry into the region a simpler process in comparison to
other regions. It was pointed out in previous research, in order for Tesla’s to take advantage of the opportunities in South Korea, it will
need to alleviate risk by scaling their business to manufacture and deliver automobiles more quickly to their customers. In addition to
that, they wouldn’t also need to devise a regional marketing campaign that will help their South Korean consumer understand why
Tesla’s electric cars are a better value than the traditional, fossil fuel burning vehicle.
The recommended market of entry for Tesla is South Korea. To be successful in a new market, Tesla will need significant
resources within the country. South Korea will be able to provide a workforce who is skilled in electrical engineering and the
craftsmanship required to manufacture and maintain Tesla’s fleet of electric automobiles. The region will also have the infrastructure
in place to allow customers to charge and properly utilize their vehicles. The economy of South Korea as compared to Brazil has
experienced less inflation and the citizens of South Korea have a higher level of disposable income which will be required to purchase
a Tesla automobile. Additionally, South Korea offers a free zone for trade which will make entry into the region a simpler process in
comparison to other regions. Finally, the environmental legislature set by the government will help persuade people to consider and
purchase electric cars.

Analysis

Competition within the market exists where there are many producers of the same commodity struggling to satisfy their needs
over a certain number of consumers. The existence of Competition is argued to be triggered by some factors such as the need to avoid
monopolistic market as well as the need to provide an alternative provider of a product. Although competition is said to have positive
impacts such as leading to innovation among firms, improve customer services, making organizations to understand their market as
well as offering education to competitors concerning the strength and weakness of the other companies it also has adverse effects such
as reducing the size of the market. It is, therefore, the task of competing firms to understand the strength and weakness of their
competitors to survive in the market (Preis, et al 1991).
Tesla which is an automobile industry has both local and international competitors who need to be understood and then
formulate a strategy that will outcome their competition. Competitive risk assessment is a tool used by a business to identify the
availability of competitors in the market and the impacts they have on the company.
Competitive Risk
These are actions by the competitors to challenge your business negatively. Among the example concerning competing risk
include promotion, resources, innovation, pricing, and location. There is need to assess the competitive threat of Tesla’s competitors to
come up with a competitive strategy that will help the Company to overcome the competitors.
BMW

BMW is a worldwide Company based in Germany and is known for manufacturing automotive products. The major markets
of the firm are found in China, France, and United States, United Kingdom and Germany as well as other minor markets in other
countries around the world. The BMW plan to design an electric car in 2013 was a competitive risk to Tesla. BMW Company saw the
need to embrace innovation in its products and design an electric vehicle known as the i3 which was to compete with the Model 3 of
Tesla. Although Tesla was among the first organizations to produce an electric car in 2003, it was facing significant competition from
BMW which has entered the market of manufacturing electric cars and having the advantage of a strong brand in the market. Tesla
sped up the production of Model 3 that was to have added features such as a mobile App, Motor controls and the creation of
supercharging systems that outweighed the competitive risk of BMW (BMW Group 2016).
Renault-Samsung Motors
Renault-Samsung Motors (RSM) is an automobile firm based in South Korea and it is appreciated for its Sedan model. The
Company was the first to manufacture an SM3 Z.E Sedan which is electric. It was to compete with Tesla over the production of
electric cars both wanting to have a broad market (Lee, et al 2007). RSM has a strong brand as well as an extensive market both in
Korea, South America, and China which gives it a global presence. Also, the joint ventures with other players in the market such as
Mahindra in India have given the company more strength.
Hyundai
Hyundai is a South Korean automotive brand whose headquarters is located in Seoul. The Company is among the major
manufacturers of vehicles within South Korea and has a large scale of the market. Consequently, in 2013, the organization was

indicated to have contributed approximately 29.7 percent of the South Korean net profit after Samsung. It was argued that the broad
product portfolio of the Company as well as the increased demanding personality of the Koreans contributed to the increase in the
firm’s market share. Being a competitor of Tesla, it has both locations and resources as competitive risks (Lee, 2011).
South Korea having been concluded to be the best country for the venturing of Tesla Company, has competitors such as
Hyundai Company which has greater access to the market. It is thus a risk to Tesla which is yet to have a high brand as well as a wide
range of the market. Apart from Hyundai being able to acquire the local market, the Company has also done measures to diversify its
market globally by expanding the research and development sector and creation of a contributory market in various regions. The result
was a more substantial market size at a low cost of production as well as spreading the competitive risk to the competitors.
Furthermore, the joint ventures that the industry has engaged in with other automobile firms are a competitive risk to Tesla.
Hyundai has exported its skills and technology to other countries such as Japan, North America, and Europe which is not only selling
the brand of the Company but also improving its knowledge in innovating new brands of cars (Han, B, et al 2015).
Volkswagen
Volkswagen Group is an international automotive Company which is situated in Wolfsburg, Germany. The organization is
recognized for its Audi, Bugatti, Lamborghini, VW and the Porsche brands. The Company has an aim of selling ten million cars in
2018. VW and its ambition to enter the American market is a competitive risk to many automobile industries, Tesla included. The firm
believes that America has a strong automotive industry and therefore needs to venture into that market. In 2011, the Company made of

up to 300000 cars which are an increase of 40000 cars from 2010 sales and 100000 increases from 2008 sales. Volkswagen, therefore,
considers having a broader market within the US and needs to strengthen its moves.
Furthermore, in 2017, Volkswagen publicized its plan of producing electric cars which was to compete with Tesla’s product.
China had a plan of getting rid of gasoline engines with the aim of conserving the environment was to pave the way for battery power-
driven cars within the market. Therefore, VW was hoping to sell approximately three million electric cars by 2025 (Leavy, 2015).
Also, the I.D crozz car model of Volkswagen was anticipated to be in the market in 2020. The car will also have a battery that ranges
about 310 to 370 Kilometers based on the standards of European. With this model in the market, Tesla will be exposed to a larger
competition from VW.
GM Korea
It is also an automotive firm found in South Korea and being in the third manufacturer in the country. The brands of the
Company include the Chevrolet as well as the Alpheon which are high on demand. Being founded in 1937, as well as a subsidiary of
GM it has a top product portfolio than Tesla. As a risk to Tesla, the firm has established a joint benefit with the United States thus
having an extended market (Jun, & Rowley, 2014).
Ssang Young
It is the fourth largest automotive industry in South Korea consequently, a secondary of the Indian global Mahindra and
Mahindra. The Company generates a more significant percentage of revenue to South Korea over the years. The firm has invested

much in research and development which has resulted in the innovation of new products. Also, the industry has a strong brand that is
attracting a more substantial number of consumers from various countries (Dastidar, 2011).
Audi AG
It is a German automotive Company and a member of the Volkswagen group. The Company has far-reaching products which
increase its competition with other automotive firms. Audi has a strong brand as well as a joint venture with VW which has increases
its market size. In 2015, the organization had an aim of expanding the electric vehicles with the production of Audi Q7 in the market.
As its competitive risk, the firm wants to increase the safety systems of its products both to the environment and to consumers.
Consequently, the focusing of research and development by the company has positive outcomes as Audi has been able to increase the
sales volume of its product (Homfeldt, et al 2017).
Daimler AG
It is a German global automotive Company known for its Mercedes-Benz car. South Korea constitutes a broader market for
Daimler Company; much has been done in South Korea in supporting the brand of the firm. The Company has a future of creating
electric vehicles to strengthen their market in the world. By 2022, they intend to launch a Mercedes-Benz which is electric in each of
the models (Bruner, et al 2017). Consequently, their new plan of manufacturing the


Related Question