email

[solved] Week 4 Group country analysis and recommendation

Instructions

Week 4 Group country analysis and recommendation     (6% of course grade)

Assignment Overview.  There are two parts to this assignment.  In Part One, the team will select two of the most promising country markets from its individual members’ week 3 analyses.  In Part Two, the team will conduct a more detailed comparison of those two countries, with emphasis on the Opportunity for your client's particular product/service (market size and operational support) and the level of competitive Threat (competitors for your client's product/service).

Resources

Same as week 3,

Plus: Anticipating the size of your market: http://ezproxy.umuc.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX3405000012&v=2.1&u=umd_umuc&it=r&p=GVRL&sw=w&asid=15d50079221a05905ec616b5b5da6ade

 

Assignment Part One Objectives: Each team will assess and compare the PESTEL data that was developed for each of the countries analyzed by the individual team members in their week 3 assignment (number of countries = number of members x 2).  Create a comparison table to assist in this team discussion and to ensure that comparable data are used for all countries analyzed. If necessary, gather any missing data to make valid comparisons. Based on this comparison, the team will select two countries as the better potential opportunities and deserving of further analysis. 

State briefly, in two or three paragraphs, the criteria you used to compare them and the rationale for your selection of the two most favorable countries (which criteria were most important and why).  This table and text is to be posted in the Group Locker. Only the summary statement for why these two countries were selected will  be included in the Part Two written paper.

 

Assignment Part Two Objectives. The objectives are to further analyze Opportunity and Threat in the two countries and recommend one country for your client's market entry.   The team will expand the PESTEL analyses already done by (1) estimating the Economic Opportunity for your client's specific product/service; i.e., the potential market size for your client's particular product/service (2) evaluating  the general level of competitive Threat (e.g., number and size of competitors); and (3) determining  how well  your client's operational needs can be met.  

 Assignment Part Two requirements/format:


 

  1. The introduction to this paper should consist of (a) statement of purpose (b) description of your client company and industry; (b) the product/service it will be taking into the new country; (c) the selection process and rationale for why these two countries were selected as the more favorable potential markets from all the countries your team members evaluated (This is the summary rationale from Part One of this assignment).

 

  1. The body of the paper (approximately 10-15 pages, double spaced), should compare the two country markets on:





 

  •  Opportunity factors and trends – Paula

 

  • Economic:   What is the market size and growth forecast FOR YOUR COMPANY’S PRODUCT/SERVICE. Be specific about who your buyer is, then find measures that will help you determine how many buyers are in each country market.  For example, you might use something like the number of passenger car registrations to size the automobile market if your client is an auto maker.

  •   Opportunity Support factors for your product/service. (PESTEL)

  •   Opportunity (capability) to support the operational needs of your product/service (needs you identified in your company profile; e.g., suppliers for your company product/service; or supporting transportation infrastructure for distributing your product; or appropriate workforce).


 

  • Threat factors and trends – Abram

 

  • The key industry factors and trends that will likely affect the general level of competition for this product/service  (Use Porter’s 5 +2 forces)

    • To Porter, competition or  “rivalry” in an industry can be fierce, moderate, or limited, depending on the strength of the other forces; e.g., fewer buyers increases the intensity of  competition among industry firms, as does the threat of new entrants or the cost for a company to  exit a market.   What is your assessment of the general level of competition in these two countries, given how these industry factors operate in each country?

  • The specific key competitors (both multinational and local) for your company’s product/service

  • Threats to client's operational needs (e.g., lack of needed supplies, infrastructure, workforce)

  • Other Threat factors for your product/service (PESTEL) (e.g., political regulations, cultural animosity toward western brands or toward your client's type of product/service)

  •  

3.  Recommend one country for entry, based upon your analyses, and supported by appropriate data from your research.

  • For your recommended country, specifically acknowledge the country level Threats that will require  risk mitigation strategies.

  • Recommend potential mitigation strategies for these  threats


4. Conclude with a succinct summary for why you have recommended the one country for your client's new market  entry, starting (always) with the quantified opportunity (in dollars or buyers), listing the threats and the mitigation strategies that will be needed to create market success.

5. Write an Executive Summary of approximately 2 pages (summarizing the entire paper, including company and industry descriptions).

6.  Include a Title Page, with names of all contributing members, and a Table of Contents that should be placed after the Executive Summary. After the Executive Summary and Table of Contents,, number all pages of the body of the paper, starting with page one.

7.  Include Reference list, using proper APA format for all references and in-text citations.

One member is to post the group's Assignment   in your Group Assignment folder by the end of the week, titled “Country Entry Recommendation for [name of your client company]”.  

 UPDATE DRAFT BUSINESS PLAN IN YOUR LOCKER: With the completion of this assignment, you have have the data to complete Sections 6,7, and 8,  of your developing Business Plan. Please update these sections in your draft, which will be submitted as an assignment in week 6, after completing your competitor analysis. 

UPDATE SWOT MATRIX IN YOUR LOCKER. Now that you have completed your country analysis, update the draft SWOT matrix in your group locker to include country level Opportunities and Threats.The final SWOT will be submitted as an assignment in week 6, after completing your competitor analysis (client Strengths and Weaknesses).  

 Looking ahead:  This week you determined a general level of competition in your recommended country, and you identified specific competitors.. Next week you will evaluate the threat from these specific competitors and develop a general strategic approach that will best enable your client to compete against those companies.



Need customized help? Order now
user img

Plus


15-06-22 | 03:13:25

Executive Summary

Tesla currently as a brand name is known for building all electrical personal vehicles. Vehicles that do not rely on fossil fuels to allow the vehicle to function and move around. These vehicles are considered more of a luxury option as the price point is much higher than middle income American can afford. This is about to change as new models are about to appear on the market and have a lower price point. Allowing for Tesla to expand not only in North America but into other countries.
Brazil and the Philippines at a high-level are reviewed in this paper. Both countries have some similar development and societal issues. Both also have different opportunities that offset negativities of their threats. Overall Brazil has a more favorable environment that would allow for Tesla to grow in. As Brazil boasts the largest rain forests; there is a worldview of the forests disappearing and global warming increasing. Tesla being in Brazil will show that Brazil is vested in being environmentally friendly with motor vehicle options and reducing the carbon footprint.

Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to give a high-level overview of Brazil and the Philippines to help decide which of the two are a better fit for Tesla to invest into. Both countries have threats and opportunities that need to be assessed and rated for a company to decide which is a better option. The review that was conduct did determine a country that would be at a high-level a suitable country to invest in and grow as a company. Growth not only would help the company but employment would help develop a nation.
Tesla is a company that has a growing diverse portfolio that initially started in automobiles. Tesla’s product is unique amongst its peers as Tesla’s product are completely electric; whereas competitors are mostly fossil-fuel based. This is a more environmentally friendly vehicle; though the price point is high for most consumers. Tesla is about to release new models with a lower price point opening up to more customers.
The automotive industry spans many regions, countries, various customers and spending abilities. The majority of automobiles created and sold are fossil fuel based; whereas Tesla’s vehicles are all electric. Customers will spend money on automobiles on what they can afford or want. Tesla’s price point is higher than what most middle income United States citizens can afford currently. As technology has evolved in the automotive industry specifically what Tesla has in development will allow for a lower price point. This will open the market not only in the United States but also other countries where disposable income is lower.

Automotive Industry
Opportunity Factors and Trends
Brazil
Economic Market Opportunity and Potential Growth
Brazil is the world’s fifth-largest country with a population over 200 million citizens. The majority of the population resides along the coast of the Atlantic Ocean in major cities, along with some major cities within the country. Heritage Foundation gives a rating of 52.9 for Brazil on a scale off 100; 100 being the best score to have for a country for business growth. A significant score detraction is the fact that the political system is riddled with corruption and scandals to include the current President Michel Temer (Brazil, 2017). The country risk rating is a C; Political and economic outlook is very uncertain; business environment has weaknesses that have an impact on payments, leading to a high probability of corporate default (Brazil: Government, 2017).
Opportunity Support Factors
Political Support
The judicial system is inefficient, overburdened and can be intimidated by both internal and external influences. Thus, leading to the judicial system to be untrusted by not only the public but also by businesses. Taxes within Brazil vary from 27.5 percent for personal income to businesses’ that start with a base of 15 percent escalating up to 34 percent with added taxations. The average overall taxation equals 39.5 percent of total output. Government spending is 39.5 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP); for Brazil, the GDP is $3.2 trillion per year. Business regulations are outmoded, rigid and inhibits employment growth. Creating a business is viewed as time-consuming, cumbersome, bureaucratic and costly. Trade through import and export equals 27 percent of GDP the tariff rate is 7.8 percent.
Economic Support
Brazil top industries are Textiles; Cement; Chemicals and Shoes. The GDP Growth rate is -3.6 percent. CDP compositions consist of 5.45 percent in Agriculture, 73.3 percent for Services; 21.24 percent for Industry and 11.71 percent for Manufacturing. Consumer inflation is 8.7 percent, total tax rate of 68.4 percent, real interest rate of 40.4 percent with an external debt stocks of $543 billion (Brazil: Economy, 2017).
Social Support
Brazil’s population statistics in 2016 are 208 million with 85.9 percent residing in urban areas with a growth rate of 0.8 percent annually; 43.6 percent are of working-age. In 2015, the Infant Mortality rate was 14.6 per1.000 live births and a Life Expectancy of 75 years (Brazil: Statistics, 2017). Ethnic groups consist of “White - 53.7%, mulatto - 38.5%, black - 6.2%, others - 1.6%” (Brazil: Insights, 2011).
Technological Support
Brazil in 2015 had 258 million cellular telephones, 124 percent of the population; 121 million internet users, 58 percent of the population and 44 million telephones, 21 percent of population (Brazil: Statistics, 2017). Current strengths are government encouragement improving research and development and a large defense and aerospace industries. Current challenges are low research and development results and lack of international and national collaboration. Future prospects are the Inova Empresa Plan (Inova Empresa Plan is to boost productivity in key sectors). Future risks are low availability of personnel in the science and technology (Brazil: In-depth, 2016).
Environmental Support
Brazil has a rich biodiversity and utilize hydropower which are its current environmental strengths. Current challenges are changes in the forest code, air pollution with CO2 emissions and a poor management of waste. Reduction in deforestation, increasing ecotourism and plan of renewable energy and reforestation lead to Brazil’s future prospects. Future risks are projects that endanger the environment and threatens species (Brazil: In-depth, 2016).
Legal Support
Brazil has a comprehensive legal structure that is a current strength. Brazil faces many current challenges such as complications in the tax system, increasing corruption in the country, delays in the judicial system, intellectual property protection concerns and policies in trade and industry that are not addressing productivity growth or competition. Future prospect is that Brazil that is developing an anti-corruption laws. Future risks are market regulations of product and an inefficient regulatory environment (Brazil: In-depth, 2016).
Philippines
Economic Market Opportunity and Potential Growth
The Philippines is a collection of over 7,000 islands in the western Pacific Ocean. Heritage Foundation gives a rating of 65.6 for the Philippines on a scale off 100. During President Benigno Aquino III term, 2010-2016 the president successfully improved the Philippines economy to be one of the best-performing within the region. While agriculture is the significant source of the economy, industrial production is on the rise (Philippines, 2017). The country risk rating is a A4; Political and economic outlook is shaky; business environment is volatile that can have an impact on payments, leading to an acceptable average of corporate defaults (Philippines: Government, 2017).
Opportunity Support Factors
Political Support
The judicial system is inefficient, can be corrupted, complex procedures and intimidation. Though the judicial system is strong, laws are ineffectual. Taxes within Philippines max out at 32 percent for personal income and corporate max out at 30 percent. The average overall taxation equals13.6 percent of total output. Government spending is 18.8 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP); for Brazil, the GDP is $741 billion per year. There are gradual improvements to regulations and reduction in time and cost to obtain licensing. Trade through import and export equals 61 percent of GDP the tariff rate is 4.3 percent.
Economic Support
The Philippines top industries are Footwear; Garments; Pharmaceuticals and Electronics assembly. The GDP Growth rate is 6.9 percent. CDP compositions consist of 9.65 percent in Agriculture, 59.52 percent for Services; 30.83 percent for Industry and 19.65 percent for Manufacturing. Consumer inflation is 1.8 percent, total tax rate of 42.9 percent, real interest rate of 3.92 percent with an external debt stocks of $77 billion (Philippines: Economy, 2017).
Social Support
Philippines’s population statistics in 2016 are 103 million with 57.9 percent residing in urban areas with a growth rate of 1.6 percent annually; 57.9 percent are of working-age. In 2015, the Infant Mortality rate was 22.2 per1.000 live births and a Life Expectancy of 69 years (Philippines: Statistics, 2017). Ethnic groups consist of “Tagalog - 28.1%, Cebuano - 13.1%, Ilocano - 9%, Bisaya/Binisaya - 7.6%, Hiligaynon Ilonggo - 7.5%, Bikol - 6%, Waray - 3.4%, others - 25.3% (Philippines: Insights, 2011).
Technological Support
The Philippines in 2015 had 120 million cellular telephones, 117 percent of population; 41 million internet users, 40 percent of population and 3 million telephones, 3 percent of population (Philippines: Statistics, 2017). Current strengths are high technology exports, strong information technology and the business-process outsourcing sectors. Current challenge are high levels of piracy in the country. Future prospects are the building of a technology lab; whereas, the future risk is low research and development expenditures. (Philippines: In-Depth, 2015).


Related Question